Skip to main content

Crossroads - The Cross of Christ

Four local church pastors discuss the cross. 

Michael John, pastor of Market Street Baptist Church, moderates this discussion on the cross with panelists Dave Hammer, pastor of Danville Baptist Church, Rick Harrington, pastor of First Baptist Church of Haverhill, MA and Brian Bethke, pastor of Middleton Congregational Church.

PART 1: Exploring the Text

Jesus gives clear direction as to who He is and what He is about to do. Peter embraces the person of Christ, but is initially offended by the cross. Why is that the case? Why did a faithful disciple and follower of JEsus take such offense at his prediction of his death? Why did Jesus accuse Peter of doing the Devil's work? Why was it necessary for the Christ to die? Why did he have to die on a Cross? 

PART 2: Applying the Text 

The Cross is a great offense to many in this world...progressives say that this teaching on the cross is "Divine Child Abuse"...that it is barbaric to think that God would demand blood payment in order to forgive our sins...why can't God just forgive us? Do they have a point? The Muslims also are offended by the cross for a different reason (similar to the Jews offense).  They see this as a humiliating defeat for their Prophet. Therefore, God tricked the world and made it only appear as if Jesus died. It was actually Judas (or maybe Simon of Cyrene) who was crucified...Jesus did not taste death but ascended to heaven. Do they have a point? How is the cross not a humiliating defeat for Jesus? How does the Biblical teaching of the Cross confront our world today? Particularly American culture.


Popular posts from this blog

Return to Rome?

All right. Here is my first question to throw around to everyone: "Why am I not Roman Catholic?" (of course, if you are, help us understand why you are and why we should be(?)) Sounds like an easy question, but not so easy. Let me ask a few penetrating questions to get us going. These are all questions I've heard in different forms... Does Christ not have only one church? Does Rome not have the only consistent historical connection to the early church? Did not Rome determine the new Testament cannon of Scriptures? Does not Rome have what so many evangelicals lack: mystery, awe, contemplation, etc.? One more, does our theology go asunder so irreparably? Consider these Evangelical favorites: J RR Tolkien, G K Chesterton, and Mother Theresa. Are they not a sterling model of Christian imagination , thinking and service ? Hope this gets some discussion going.

The 'Greatest' Theologian/Preacher/Christian Philosopher

Here's a fun little discussion for us. Who is the greatest theologian since the apostle Paul? Sounds too subjective, but here are some criteria to evaluate by: 1) Personal life - Did this person's personal character reflect his convictions effectively? 2) Breadth of Influence - How wide and long has this person's influence effected the church and the world? 3) Depth of thought - How careful, biblical, and articulate were this persons's works? My vote to come...

Does Church History Matter?

In a so called unprecedented age, where all of Christianity is re-inventing itself, and all of Christian doctrine is up for re-writing , one must ask the question "Does church history matter?" (Just to write this almost makes me cringe at how unbelievably near-sighted my generation has become!) If we say 'yes it matters' too emphatically, the response will be "Why are you Protestants then?" Didn't Luther radically depart from centuries of theological teaching. One common criticism against Luther (and the Reformation) was "Can you alone be right and the whole world be wrong?" And, when Luther talks about Sola Scriptura, isn't he saying Scripture is all that matters? A few things about Luther. First, his Sola Scriptura argument was not that Scripture is the only authority for the church, but that Scripture alone is the final authority for the church. According to Luther, there can be, indeed should be, lesser authorities, including pasto