Skip to main content

A powerful account from Church History

According to St. Basil, the early church father, under the persecutions of the emperor Licinius, there were forty Roman soldiers who became Christians.  They were commanded to renounce Christ.  They refused and were condemned by the prefect to be exposed naked upon a frozen pond near Sebaste on a bitterly cold night in hopes that they would reject Christ.  Nearby a hot bath was set up so that if they simply reject Christ, they could get warm and survive.  The men supposedly chanted, “Here die 40 men for Christ.  Here die 40 men for Christ.”

One of the guards set to keep watch over the soldiers watched in astonishment as these men were willing to give it all in order to be faithful to Christ.  Their unity, their faithfulness, their bond together, must have seemed like nothing he had ever seen in this world.  Among the 40 soldiers, one yielded and went to the warm baths.  The soldiers began to chant instead, “Here die 39 men for Christ."  The guard who watched threw off his clothes and walked out to the 39 soldiers.  He began to chant with them again “Here die 40 men for Christ.  Here die 40 men Christ.”  By the following day every one of them was dead.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Return to Rome?

All right. Here is my first question to throw around to everyone: "Why am I not Roman Catholic?" (of course, if you are, help us understand why you are and why we should be(?)) Sounds like an easy question, but not so easy. Let me ask a few penetrating questions to get us going. These are all questions I've heard in different forms... Does Christ not have only one church? Does Rome not have the only consistent historical connection to the early church? Did not Rome determine the new Testament cannon of Scriptures? Does not Rome have what so many evangelicals lack: mystery, awe, contemplation, etc.? One more, does our theology go asunder so irreparably? Consider these Evangelical favorites: J RR Tolkien, G K Chesterton, and Mother Theresa. Are they not a sterling model of Christian imagination , thinking and service ? Hope this gets some discussion going.

The 'Greatest' Theologian/Preacher/Christian Philosopher

Here's a fun little discussion for us. Who is the greatest theologian since the apostle Paul? Sounds too subjective, but here are some criteria to evaluate by: 1) Personal life - Did this person's personal character reflect his convictions effectively? 2) Breadth of Influence - How wide and long has this person's influence effected the church and the world? 3) Depth of thought - How careful, biblical, and articulate were this persons's works? My vote to come...

Does Church History Matter?

In a so called unprecedented age, where all of Christianity is re-inventing itself, and all of Christian doctrine is up for re-writing , one must ask the question "Does church history matter?" (Just to write this almost makes me cringe at how unbelievably near-sighted my generation has become!) If we say 'yes it matters' too emphatically, the response will be "Why are you Protestants then?" Didn't Luther radically depart from centuries of theological teaching. One common criticism against Luther (and the Reformation) was "Can you alone be right and the whole world be wrong?" And, when Luther talks about Sola Scriptura, isn't he saying Scripture is all that matters? A few things about Luther. First, his Sola Scriptura argument was not that Scripture is the only authority for the church, but that Scripture alone is the final authority for the church. According to Luther, there can be, indeed should be, lesser authorities, including pasto