Skip to main content

What would you want in a New Service?

At FBC we are thinking about adding a new service, open to everyone but geared towards 20-30-40 year olds. The gospel remains the constant, but how are we to be all things to all men that by all possible means we might save some. What would you want to see happening in a worship service that would allow style to work towards gospel-centeredness rather than as a hindrance from it? Examples

1. Breaking into small group prayer, more chance for fellowship

2. Better use of technology

3. Question/answer times during or after the message

4. More cultural engagement --dealing with what's going on in the world

5. More ancient liturgy, candles, incense, better tie into history

Any thoughts, lay them out.


Reflections on the FBC 1st Service

"The people have been marketed, they have been pitched, they have been sold, they have had their felt needs assuaged. What they haven’t had is anyone get up and open the Bible, tell them who God is, what he has done and call them to repentance in a very clear, forthright way that respects their intelligence."
-Mark Driscoll, Pastor of Mars Hill Church

A Caveat:
Since more time is spent outside the weekly gathering, this service must not be an end to itself but must fortify the Christian for the living of the Christian life…which is 24/7.

A sense of the Holy - “other-ness” of God. God big, man small!

Word / Prayer:
Preaching: Substantial, consistent, faithful Biblical –theological exposition (follow the flow of thought) of the Word of God displaying Jesus as the hero of every page of scripture…in plain language. Doctrine precedes practice. Grace-driven. The Bible forms all of worship services and life.
Prayer: A keen understanding of our utter dependence on God, expressed in our enjoyment of being with Him before, during and after the service. Verbal and thoughtful, silent contemplation.

As God-centered and Christ-exalting as preaching and prayer. Content over volume. Variety of style.

Weekly observance of the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ.

Structure: creative. Biblical absolutes identified and held tightly, non-absolutes held loosely. Place / day / time / length of service / order, etc.

Q&A sessions to follow. Share meals (lunch) together.

See Grace Fellowship website (
NOTE their Grace Talks (
Unknown said…
Feed his little lambs with His Word and they will be satisfied. Feed them goat food and only the goats will come. Always remain faithful to His Word and beware of those who do not understand the power of the Gospel that He has entrusted into your care.

Popular posts from this blog

Return to Rome?

All right. Here is my first question to throw around to everyone: "Why am I not Roman Catholic?" (of course, if you are, help us understand why you are and why we should be(?)) Sounds like an easy question, but not so easy. Let me ask a few penetrating questions to get us going. These are all questions I've heard in different forms... Does Christ not have only one church? Does Rome not have the only consistent historical connection to the early church? Did not Rome determine the new Testament cannon of Scriptures? Does not Rome have what so many evangelicals lack: mystery, awe, contemplation, etc.? One more, does our theology go asunder so irreparably? Consider these Evangelical favorites: J RR Tolkien, G K Chesterton, and Mother Theresa. Are they not a sterling model of Christian imagination , thinking and service ? Hope this gets some discussion going.

The 'Greatest' Theologian/Preacher/Christian Philosopher

Here's a fun little discussion for us. Who is the greatest theologian since the apostle Paul? Sounds too subjective, but here are some criteria to evaluate by: 1) Personal life - Did this person's personal character reflect his convictions effectively? 2) Breadth of Influence - How wide and long has this person's influence effected the church and the world? 3) Depth of thought - How careful, biblical, and articulate were this persons's works? My vote to come...

Does Church History Matter?

In a so called unprecedented age, where all of Christianity is re-inventing itself, and all of Christian doctrine is up for re-writing , one must ask the question "Does church history matter?" (Just to write this almost makes me cringe at how unbelievably near-sighted my generation has become!) If we say 'yes it matters' too emphatically, the response will be "Why are you Protestants then?" Didn't Luther radically depart from centuries of theological teaching. One common criticism against Luther (and the Reformation) was "Can you alone be right and the whole world be wrong?" And, when Luther talks about Sola Scriptura, isn't he saying Scripture is all that matters? A few things about Luther. First, his Sola Scriptura argument was not that Scripture is the only authority for the church, but that Scripture alone is the final authority for the church. According to Luther, there can be, indeed should be, lesser authorities, including pasto