Skip to main content

U2 Bono Speaks at the Harvard university part 2


Anonymous said…
I am a conservative. I am the quintessential right wing wacko. As such I shudder and whence and the thought of being forced by my government to fix someone else’s problem. I am a human with a heart and a soul. More importantly I am a Christian. As such mine is to look after orphans and widows. Mine is to give my cloak and my tunic. I want to help Africa and others. I will do this with my hands, my heart, my mouth, my guitar and yes my wallet. But not my tax dollars.

It should also be noted that Bono is the greatest rock star in the history of the world.
Tom said…
Interesting speech. I thought most interesting was his comment at the very end: "human nature will follow where it is led" or something like that. Very true, and if it is true that apart from the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives, we are led by our own depravity and the devil himself, what does that do with his whole idea of debt repayment? Like him, I abhor the evil that has happened, but merely reducing debt only leaves a lot of dollars out there. For every story of someone who uses the money well, some will take advantage of it. We are in a loose-loose situation apart from the work of the gospel in people's lives. Therefore, while I want to 'feed hungry bellies' I even more want the gospel to be shared. I don't see how we Christians can do anything humanitarian without an explicit, overt, and primary emphasis on the proclaimed gospel. Of course, this must be done by those who have truly experienced Christ it lacks all power, but that is where our money should we send it that way.


Popular posts from this blog

Return to Rome?

All right. Here is my first question to throw around to everyone: "Why am I not Roman Catholic?" (of course, if you are, help us understand why you are and why we should be(?)) Sounds like an easy question, but not so easy. Let me ask a few penetrating questions to get us going. These are all questions I've heard in different forms... Does Christ not have only one church? Does Rome not have the only consistent historical connection to the early church? Did not Rome determine the new Testament cannon of Scriptures? Does not Rome have what so many evangelicals lack: mystery, awe, contemplation, etc.? One more, does our theology go asunder so irreparably? Consider these Evangelical favorites: J RR Tolkien, G K Chesterton, and Mother Theresa. Are they not a sterling model of Christian imagination , thinking and service ? Hope this gets some discussion going.

The 'Greatest' Theologian/Preacher/Christian Philosopher

Here's a fun little discussion for us. Who is the greatest theologian since the apostle Paul? Sounds too subjective, but here are some criteria to evaluate by: 1) Personal life - Did this person's personal character reflect his convictions effectively? 2) Breadth of Influence - How wide and long has this person's influence effected the church and the world? 3) Depth of thought - How careful, biblical, and articulate were this persons's works? My vote to come...

Does Church History Matter?

In a so called unprecedented age, where all of Christianity is re-inventing itself, and all of Christian doctrine is up for re-writing , one must ask the question "Does church history matter?" (Just to write this almost makes me cringe at how unbelievably near-sighted my generation has become!) If we say 'yes it matters' too emphatically, the response will be "Why are you Protestants then?" Didn't Luther radically depart from centuries of theological teaching. One common criticism against Luther (and the Reformation) was "Can you alone be right and the whole world be wrong?" And, when Luther talks about Sola Scriptura, isn't he saying Scripture is all that matters? A few things about Luther. First, his Sola Scriptura argument was not that Scripture is the only authority for the church, but that Scripture alone is the final authority for the church. According to Luther, there can be, indeed should be, lesser authorities, including pasto